Interview with former creator immunizations
There is an erroneous view of the initial vaccination. That they are complex ways to stimulate the immune system to create conditions for immunity to the disease. It is a false premise. It does not work. Graft is intended for "production" of antibodies for protection against disease. However, the immune system is much more complicated and confusing than the antibodies and their related "killer cells".
-------
John Rappoport
interview with the former creator of vaccines
Dr. Mark Randol - nickname researcher
vaccines for immunization, for many years
worked in the laboratories of major pharmaceutical companies and government
National Institutes of Health.
Question (Q): Once you have been believe that vaccines - a symbol of progressive medicine.
Reply (0): Yes. I helped develop several vaccines. I will not say which ones.
Q: Why?
A: I want to to remain incognito.
Q: So you think you may have problems if you open?
A: I think that I could lose my pension.
Q: On what basis?
A: It does not matter. These people have the opportunity to give you trouble if you were once a member. I know a few people for whom followed and that bothered.
Q: Who did it?
A: FBI.
Q: Really?
A: Without a doubt. FBI used other pretexts. May be held and the IRS.
Q: Is it too much for a simple freedom of speech?
A: I was part of the "inner circle". If I start naming names and blaming individual researchers, I will have a lot of problems.
Q: What is behind these attempts to bring trouble?
A: Vaccinations - The last line of defense in the modern medicine. Immunisation - the highest expression of "magnificence" of modern medicine.
Q: Do you think that people should be given the option to cultivate or not?
A: At the political level - yes. On a scientific level - people have to provide information so they can make the right choice. Easy to say: "The choice - Is good. " But if the atmosphere is permeated with lies, how can you choose? If the head of the Office of control pischevyx Food and Drug (FDA) were decent people vaccinated would not be permitted. They would be investigated in detail.
Q: There are historians of medicine, who argue that the overall decline in incidence was not result of vaccinations.
A: I know. For a long time I did not pay attention to these studies.
Q: Why?
A: I'm afraid that I could find. I did vaccination business. The level of my life depended on the continuation of this work.
Q: And then?
A: I myself have researched this topic myself.
Q: What were your findings?
A: Reduced incidence was due to improved living conditions.
Q: Under what conditions?
A: More than pure water. Improved sewerage system. Food. Fresh agricultural products. Poverty reduction. Germs may be everywhere, but if you're healthy, you do not become infected easily.
Q: How did you feel When completed your studies?
A: Despair. I realized that I worked in a concentrated area lies.
: Are there any immunizations that are more dangerous than others?
A: Yes. DPT (DPT - AK), for example. MMR (combined measles, mumps and rubella - AK). In addition, some series of the same vaccine may be more dangerous than a another. My concern is that all vaccinations are dangerous.
Q. Why?
A: Several reasons. They involve the human body in a process whose goal is to undermining the immune system. They are, in fact, that may cause illness, from which are intended to protect. They can cause other illnesses, other than those to prevent which should have been.
Q: Why should we give statistics showing that vaccines have been extremely successful in eliminating disease?
A: Why? To create the illusion that the vaccines are useful. If vaccination suppresses visible symptoms of diseases such as measles, one may consider that the vaccination was successful. But under this guise of vaccination can damage the immune system. And if it causes other diseases - meningitis, for example - this fact is not noticed because Nobody believes that this could be vaccinated. Relationship is simply ignored.
Q: It is reported that vaccination eradicated smallpox in England.
A: Yes. But when you study the available statistics, in front of you gets a different picture.
Q: What?
A: There were cities in England, where the non-vaccinated do not develop smallpox. There were cities, where the grafted population was experiencing an epidemic of smallpox. But smallpox has been declining before the introduction of vaccination.
Q: So you are saying that we lied to?
A: exactly what I am saying. History drove a way to convince people that vaccines are invariably safe and effective.
Q: You worked in the laboratory. What do you How about clean there?
A: People think that these industrial laboratories - the purest in the world. That's not true. Infection occur constantly. "Building garbage constantly gets in the vaccine.
Q: For example, the monkey virus SV-40, proskolznuvshy in polio vaccine.
A: Yes, it was. But I am not what I mean. Virus SV-40 came in the vaccine, because we used monkey kidneys. I'm talking about something else. On the real laboratory environment. Errors. Negligence. SV-40, which was later found in cancer tumors - that is what I would call a structural problem. It was an accepted part of the production process. If you use a monkey kidneys, you open the door to you unknown pathogens, are in them.
Q: Okay, let's digress for a moment on the difference between the types of contaminants substances. What substances you discover during the years of your work in the laboratories?
A: I will give you examples of what I found and what are my colleagues. But this is only part. In the measles vaccine "Rimaveks" we found various chicken viruses. In the polio vaccine, we found acanthameba, which is called "amoeba eats brain. " Simian cytomegalovirus in the same polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Avian cancer vaccine MMR. Various microorganisms in the anthrax vaccine. I've found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Viruses ducks, dogs, rabbits in a vaccine against rubella. Pestivirus in the vaccine MMR.
Q: I want to understand. All of these contaminants are not related to the vaccines themselves.
A: Right. And it is impossible to determine the harm they can do, because no research in this direction has been conducted, or almost done. This roulette. Risk to you. Most people know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccine, rubella vaccine and the Hepatitis A vaccine made from aborted human tissue fruit. I figured: what I discovered from time to time and bacterial fragments believed, in fact, could come from the embryonic tissues. When you are looking for contaminants in vaccines, then with all the detectable material you are confused. You know that this should not be there, but it's - you view do not have. I found what I thought was the smallest fragments of human hair or human mucus. I found what can only determine as a foreign protein, "and that, in fact, could be anything.
B: Bells ringing everywhere.
A: And how do you think I feel? Do not forget that this whole material directly into the bloodstream, bypassing the normal immune barrier.
Q: How do your findings have been taken?
A: As a general rule: "Do not worry, there's nothing not do. " Creating a vaccine, we use various animal tissues, and they are a source of pollutants. Naturally, I did not mention here, such standard chemicals, like mercury, formaldehyde, and aluminum, which are purposefully used in vaccines.
Q: This is amazing.
A: Yes. And I'm here to note only part of the biological contaminants. Who knows how many more? We do not know about them, because they are not looking. If the tissue, such as birds, are used to vaccine production, how many possible pathogens can get into the vaccine? We do not know. We do not know that it can be, and how it may affect people.
Q: And besides cleanliness?
A: There is an erroneous view of the initial vaccination. That they are complex ways to stimulate the immune system to create the conditions immunity to the disease. It is a false premise. It does not work. Graft is intended for "production" of antibodies to protect against disease. However, immune system is much more complicated and confusing than the antibodies and their related "killer cells".
Q: What is the immune system ...
A: In reality - The whole organism. And consciousness. All this you can call the immune system. Therefore, in the midst of the epidemic you find people who remain healthy.
Q: What is important is the level of health.
A: Do not just important. It is vitally important.
Q: How do distorted statistics?
A: There are many ways. For example, 25 people were vaccinated against hepatitis B, are sick with the disease. Hepatitis B - liver disease. But the causes of liver disease, a lot. You can change the diagnosis. Thus, you zamaskiruete roots of disease.
Q: And so doing?
A: All the time. This should be done if the doctors automatically assume that those vaccinated do not become ill of the disease, from which they were supposed to protect. This is exactly what the doctors think. You see, this circular thinking. This is a closed system. It does not allow errors. Possible error. If the person who received the vaccine against hepatitis B, hepatitis C becomes ill, is automatically assumed that his illness has no nothing to do with hepatitis.
Q: During the years of your work in the vaccine establishment, how many doctors admit that vaccines are a problem, you counted?
A: None. Several people have asked me privately about what they do. But they never shared their concerns with the public, including in their companies.
Q: What was the turning point for you?
A: I had a friend whose baby died after inoculation of DPT.
Q: Have you studied this case?
A: Yes, informally. I discovered that before vaccination the child was perfectly healthy. No other cause of death, but vaccination was not. Thus began my doubts. Of course, I wanted to believe that the child just got an unsuccessful shot from a failed series. But when I continue to study this case, I realized that nothing like this in this the case was not. I was involved in the cycle of doubt that over time became more and more. My research continued. In contrast to I previously thought, I found that vaccines are not scientifically studied.
Q: What do you mean?
A: For example, do not make long-term research on vaccines. Not traced carefully the consequences of vaccination. Why? Because, as I said, it is believed that vaccination can not bring harm. Why do I need something another check? In addition, there are certain reactions to the vaccine, so that all possible trouble must occur soon after immunized. But this is nonsense.
Q: Why nonsense?
A: Because the vaccine, no doubt, acts in the body for a long time after it was done. The reaction can be gradual. Deterioration can be gradual. Over time can develop neurological problems. This happens in different ways in different conditions, it is even according to the accepted analysis now. But why the same can not be the case with vaccines? If chemical poisoning can be gradual, why the same can not be with vaccines containing mercury?
Q: And this is what you found?
A: Yes. Most of the time you are in correlations. This is not the best solution. But if you have 500 parents, children whose nervous system was damaged, this should be sufficient to initiate most careful study.
Q: And this has ever been enough?
A: None. Never. And that you immediately about something said.
Q: What was it?
A: People engaged in studies are not really interested in learning the facts. They argue that vaccines are safe. Thus, when they explore this topic, they always, eventually, come to their full recovery. They say: "Vaccinations are safe." But based on what this statement? On definitions and ideas which will automatically reject any condemnation of vaccinations.
Q: There are many examples of failures of the vaccination companies. When people get a disease from which they are planted.
A: Yes, such examples abound. And the evidence is simply ignored. They do not pay attention. Experts say if anything they say in general, what are the individual cases, in general, vaccinations have proven their safety. But if you think all these companies and disease damage, then you discover that it is not individual cases.
Q: When ever you are discussing what we are talking with your colleagues, with whom you have worked together in vaccine establishment?
A: Yes.
Q: So what?
A: Several times I was told to hold his tongue. I was told that I should go back to work and forget their fears. Several times I have said about their misgiving about vaccinations. Colleagues have begun to try to avoid me. They felt that can be charged with complicity. In the end, I began to behave well. And saw that no longer creates his own problems.
Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why use them?
A: First of all, there is no "if". They do harm. Difficult to answer why they do harm where it seemed would harm from them should not be. It is necessary that a study was conducted, but no one will. Researchers should try to create some maps, diagrams, shows exactly what vaccines do with the moment that enter the body. Such research has not yet been done. As for of why they are used, then we can sit here for two days in discussions on this topic. As you have said many times, different people at different levels of the system have their own motives. Money, fear of losing their jobs, prestige, awards, promotions, false idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But in the highest level of the medical cartel, vaccines are valued above all, because they weaken the immune system. I understand that it's hard to believe but it's true. At the highest level of medical cartel, people do not seek help, but only damaged, weakened. Kill them. Once I had a long conversation with a senior person in an African country. He told me that he knows about it. He said that the WHO - in the forefront of the struggle for depopulation. There is, let's call it so, underground in Africa, where government officials are sincerely trying to change the plight of the poor. Network of these people know what's going on. They know that vaccines and are used for the destruction of their country, preparing them to conquer the forces of the globalists. I had the opportunity to talk to people from this network.
In: Tao Mbeki, President of South Africa knows about it?
A: I would say this: in part. Maybe he's not completely convinced, but he is on the path to full truth. He already knows that HIV - Fiction. That funds for AIDS - poisons that destroy the immune system. He also knows that if he, in one form or another, favor with respect to vaccination, it branded as a madman. He has enough problems with his stance on AIDS.
Q: This network you speak of?
A: accumulated an enormous amount of information of vaccination. The only question is what strategy is most effective. This is a big problem for these people.
Q: And in developed countries?
A: Medical cartel holds a stranglehold, but it weakens. Mainly because people have freedom of choice of drugs. However, if discussion of freedom choice (to accept or reject medication) will descend from the agenda, preparing measures for mandatory vaccination against pathogens used in biological Weapons will be taken. Now a very important time.
IN: The noise around the vaccination against hepatitis B can do a good job.
A: Yes, I think so too. State that babies need to vaccinate, and then, without pausing for breath, say that hepatitis B infected through sexual contact and sharing Some needles - the height of absurdity. Medical authorities are trying to justify the fact that every year 20,000 children in the U.S. are infected with hepatitis B for unclear reasons, " and therefore each child should be planting. I question that figure, and research, its justified.
Q: Andrew Wakefield, an English physician who discovered link between MMR vaccine and autism, was recently dismissed from the London hospital where he worked.
A: Yes. Wakefield had a great service. Its data is simply stunning. Perhaps you know that Tony Blair's wife is fond of alternative medicine. Probably this is the reason why their child did not get vaccinated MMR. Blair recently bypassed the issue in an interview in the press, on the basis of supposedly desires to protect against interference in his private and family life. " One way or otherwise, but I think his wife silenced. I think that if she was given the chance, she would have preferred, at least, to support those families who have, that their children have suffered severe damage vaccination MMR.
Q: British reporters have to get through to her.
A: They're trying. But I think that she agreed with her husband, that will remain silent. She would have done a good deed, if violated its promise. They tell me that her crush, and not just her husband. At its level in the case enters MI-6 and Services British National Health. It becomes a matter of national security.
Q: Yes, it is national security, once you understand the essence of the medical cartel.
A: The global security. The cartel operates in every country. He jealously guards the sanctity of vaccines. Questioning vaccinations - this is about the same thing for a bishop from the Vatican to question the sanctity of the sacrament in the Catholic Church.
Q: I know that a Hollywood actor said that if he did not make a shot, it would mean the end of his career.
A: Hollywood is closely linked with the medical cartel. There are many reasons, but one that any statement of the famous actor attracts a huge number of audience. In 1992 I was at a demonstration against the Office control of foodstuffs and medicines in downtown Los Angeles. One or two actors spoke against the Office. Since that time, you will need a lot of forces to find the actor, anyway speak out against the medical cartel.
Q: What kind of mood at the National Institute of Health (NIH)?
About: Competition for research grants. The last thing they think - to change the status quo. They are entirely in its internal war for money. They do not have other problems. This is a very isolated system. It is based on the idea that, in general, modern medicine has been successful in all positions. Prevent systemic problems in any its area is to call into question the whole enterprise. Therefore, you understand that the NIH - the last one who thinks about the demonstrations. Right back. If five thousand people would require counting the actual effectiveness of the research system will require to find out what really gets the audience of billions of dollars, the smoke escaping through the chimney of the organization, perhaps something and begin to change. Something can begin. The researchers - at least some - Will begin to study the information.
B: Good idea.
A: People need to stand so close to buildings as it allows the police. People in business clothes, sportswear, mothers with children. Rich people. Poor people. All segments of the population.
Q: What about the combined destructive power of a few shots that get kids these days?
A: This is a caricature, and offense at the same time. Not had any real research, no matter how deep. I repeat: the alleged that vaccines are safe, but because how many of them together would not come on, they are still safe. But the truth is that vaccines are unsafe. Consequently, the potential Damage grows when you give a lot of shots in a short period of time.
Q: Then we fall flu season.
A: Yes. As if only in the fall to us microbes are moving from Asia. But the public is easy to swallow. If the case in April, it is cold. If in October - the flu.
Q: Do you regret having worked all these years in the field of vaccines?
A: Yes. But after this interview - a little less. In addition, I act in other ways. I give information to people who, in my opinion, it will good order.
Q: What should understand the public?
A: What is the evidence of effectiveness and safety of immunizations are committed to the very people that they produce and sell. Exactly. Instructed not to me and not you. For proof we need well-organized study. Additional data. You need to talk with mothers and pay attention to what they say about their babies and that happened to them after vaccination. You all need it. But this is not done.
Q: But this is not done.
A: Yes.
Q: To eliminate confusion - please, please, once again, to some diseases to which the problems could lead vaccinations.
A: We're talking two types of possible effects of vaccinations. In one case, graft sick of the disease which was supposed to protect him vaccinated because the vaccine is a factor in the disease itself. In another case, the graft does not develop this disease, but then, immediately or after some time, developed a different disease caused by the vaccine. It may be autism, or other disease such as meningitis. He can become mentally retarded.
Q: Is it possible to compare the relative the frequency of these effects?
A: None. Since little additional information. We can only guess. If you ask how many, among the hundred thousand children who were vaccinated against measles, sick with measles, and how much - in other diseases associated with vaccination, then the answer is no. That's what I'm talking about. Vaccinations - prejudice. You have fed stories designed to instill these prejudices. But the experience of many vaccination companies, we find stories developing in a very disturbing picture. People applied harm. He felt he could go, it can lead to death. This damage is not limited to a few cases, as we are trying to convince. In the U.S. there are groups mothers, who claim about autism and its relationship to childhood vaccines. They act at the meetings. In essence, they are trying to fill the void that was created researchers and doctors, his back turned to the problem.
Q: I have you here about what I want to ask. Take, say, a healthy baby from Boston, well-nourished, engaged in sports every day, your beloved parents, who had not received vaccination against measles - what will his health in comparison with the average health child from the same Boston, malnourished and every day conducting five o'clock in the TV screen, which were vaccinated against measles?
A: Of course, in accounting should take many factors, but I would bet on the health of their first child. If he is sick with measles at the age of 9 years, the chances that the disease he will transfer easier have their first child much more than the second. I would put only the first child.
Q: How long is the vaccine?
A: Very long. More than ten years.
Q: Looking back - you can give me an argument in favor of vaccinations?
A: No, I can not name a single one. If I now had a child, the last thing I would allow - to make his shot. If you want to - I would have moved to another state. I would have changed the name. I would have gone along with his family. But this is unlikely to be reached. There ways to circumvent the system gracefully, they just need to know. You can express their religious or philosophical views, and on this basis to obtain the release of vaccination. This is allowed in all states.
Q: Nevertheless, children everywhere receive vaccinations and seems perfectly healthy.
A: Very important word - "believe." And what about all those children who can not concentrate at school? What about the children who suffer from tantrums? And what about Children who are unable to use all their mental faculties? I know a lot of reasons for all this, but vaccinations - home. I would not risk it. I do not see causes of risk. To be honest, I do not see and reason to allow the government to decide for us. The phrase "government medicine", in my experience, often self-contradictory. Or something or other but not together.
Q: Let everyone decide for himself.
A: Yes. Allow those who want vaccinations to get them. Enable those Who does not want to refuse them. But as I said earlier, there is no possibility to choose where there is nothing but lies. And since it comes to children, make the decisions parents. These parents need a good dose of truth. What to say about the child who died from vaccine DPT? What information were his parents? It has been well filtered. It was not real information.
In: Representatives from the medical community in unison with the media scare parents horrors happen in the event that children are not vaccinated.
A: They are trying to present the rejection of grafts crime. They equate it with poor execution parenting. You can only resist this information. Fight with the authorities always safe. And only you can decide whether to do grafting. The responsibility of everyone to have their own opinion.
Afterword by John Rappoport
Dr. Mark Randol - nickname researcher vaccines, many he worked in the laboratories of major pharmaceutical companies and the government of the National Institutes of Health.
Mark resigned in the past ten years. According to him, he felt disgusted about the fact that he discovered about vaccines.
As you know, since my release, "Netlzhivymnovostyam" ("Nomorefakenews") I fight against the unscientific and dangerous assertions about the safety and efficacy of vaccines.
Mark is one of my sources information.
It is not a big fan of talk, even under the cover of their anonymity, but in light of recent attempts to make the vaccine mandatory, he decided to break the silence.
He lives comfortably in retirement, but like many of my sources, he became conscious of the fact that he did before. Mark well aware of the extent of the medical cartel and its plans for depopulation of control over the minds and the general weakening of public health.
Source: http://www.homeoint.org/kotok/vaccines/p
Original site: http://www.whale. to / v / rapp.html
0 comments:
Post a Comment